Per-Session
A per-session booking is a single, stand-alone session with no ongoing commitment. You come to me when something in the political world affects your work, your organisation, or your life, and you want to understand it with depth that nobody around you can provide. It could be a political development you saw in the news, a question a customer or staff member raised that you could not answer, a council decision that landed on your desk, or a shift in your industry that you can feel but cannot explain. You book one session, we work through it, and you leave with political understanding you did not have when you arrived.
Per-session is for people who want access to political advisory without committing to a programme or a longer arrangement. Some people book one per-session and never come back because that was all they needed. Some book one every few months when something comes up. There is no obligation to continue. These one-off sessions run for 60 minutes.
Before the session:
Book at least a week in advance of when you want to meet. Send me any relevant materials at least a week before the meeting. A council letter, a tender document, a news article, a policy your staff raised, a question from a customer, whatever prompted the booking. Include a few lines about what you want to understand or work through. The more context I have in advance, the more ground we cover in 60 minutes. Materials received less than a week before the session cannot be guaranteed coverage.
If you are bringing a second person (a business partner, a manager, a co-director), let me know in advance so I can prepare accordingly. Up to three people are included. Groups larger than three are quoted separately.
During the session:
We spend 60 minutes working through your question or situation. I do not lecture. I ask questions about your specific context, I bring the political history and analysis relevant to what you are dealing with, and we work through what it means for you together. I draw connections between what you are experiencing and the political forces behind it. I explain who is driving change, why it is happening, and what the trajectory looks like. You ask questions as we go. By the end, the political picture around your situation is clearer than it was when we started.
I may reference specific legislation, political campaigns, or policy developments as context, but the session is not a legal briefing. It is a political conversation grounded in your work and your questions.
After the session:
You go back to your work with a political understanding of your situation that you did not have before. What you do with it is yours to decide.
Some people go back to their lawyer and ask questions they would not have known to ask before. Some go to their marketing team with a different direction because they now understand the political values their audience holds. Some go to their next council meeting or trader association meeting knowing how to advocate for themselves. Some go back to their staff and have a conversation they had been avoiding because they now have the context to lead it. Some sit with it quietly and just think differently about their business.
If you want to book another session later, you can. If you want to move into a programme, a project, or a partnership, we discuss that. There is no pressure to continue.
Some samples cases:
A roofing contractor books a session because a government tender he is bidding on now requires a modern slavery statement, an Indigenous participation plan, and a social value commitment, and he has no idea what any of them mean, why they are being asked for, or how to write something that does not sound like he copied it from a template he found online. We talk through the political advocacy that created procurement reform in Australia: the community organisations that argued public money should deliver public outcomes beyond the contract itself, the modern slavery campaigns that documented exploitation in construction supply chains, the Indigenous rights advocacy that pushed for participation requirements in publicly funded projects, and the social enterprise movement that lobbied for social value to be weighted alongside price and capability. We talk through what evaluators are actually looking for when they read these sections, and why they can tell the difference between someone who understands the intent and someone who pasted in template language to meet a word count. He goes back to his tender with a social value section, a modern slavery statement, and an Indigenous participation plan that he wrote from understanding. His next conversation with his bid writer or estimator is different because he can brief them on what those sections need to convey and why. His tender stands apart from competitors who treated those sections as paperwork rather than substance.
The federal budget just landed and a childcare centre director wants to understand what the funding changes mean for her sector and why they were made. We spend 60 minutes pulling apart the budget through the lens of early childhood education, the political forces that shaped the decisions, and what they signal about the government's direction. She goes back to her team meeting able to explain not just what changed, but why, and what to watch for next. Her next conversation with her accountant is different because she understands the political trajectory behind the numbers.
A tattoo artist is approached by a client wanting a Tā Moko design and she is unsure whether to accept. We talk through the cultural and political significance of Indigenous designs, the appropriation conversation in the tattoo industry, and how to respond to culturally sensitive requests in a way that respects the communities those designs belong to. She goes back to her studio with a framework for handling these requests.
A local council announced a change to parking and loading zones on a shopping strip and the traders are angry but nobody understands why the council made the decision or how to respond. A cafe owner on the strip books a session. We work through the council's political priorities, the planning strategy behind the change, and how traders can engage with the process rather than just reacting to the outcome. She goes to her next trader association meeting knowing what to say and who to say it to.
A government policy changed and a cleaning business owner's lawyer explained what it requires, but she wants to understand why it was introduced, who pushed for it, and whether it is likely to tighten further. We work through the political history of labour regulation in the cleaning sector so she can plan beyond the immediate deadline. Her next conversation with her lawyer is different because she can ask about the trajectory, not just the current requirement.
Pricing:
My pricing follows an equitable scaling model. The base rate is determined by the size of your team: the people you employ as staff, the contractors you regularly pay to operate, and the volunteers who help you run things. The final quote reflects the scope and complexity of the session, including any preparation and research required in advance.
Teams of 1-3: base rate
Teams of 4+: scaled rate
Specific pricing is discussed at or after your initial consultation.
Notes:
I do not lobby on your behalf, represent you to government, or provide legal or financial advice. My role is to build your political understanding so that your conversations with your own advisers, your team, and your community are better informed.